BetMGM casino review
BetMGM holds a licence from the Multiple US state regulators; primary, a top-tier regulator, and scores 6.9 out of 10 for trust against other casinos licensed by top-tier regulators. Its fastest withdrawal is 2 days via PayPal, measured end to end from the withdrawal request to money in hand — not the operator's processing window alone. The minimum deposit is $10. Regulators have taken 27 published actions against BetMGM or its predecessors, which we count against the score.
Fastest withdrawal
2 days via PayPal, end to end
Minimum deposit
$10
Countries served (2)
CanadaUnited States
Ways to pay (9)
AmexApple PayBank TransferCash at casino cageDiscoverMastercardPayPalPrepaid cardVisa
Game studios (6)
EvolutionIGTNetEntPlay'n GOPlaytechRed Tiger
The record
- Licence
- Multiple US state regulators; primary-source verified in New Jersey (DGE, via Borgata/Marina District Development) and Pennsylvania (PGCB, via Hollywood Casino certificateholder). Also operates in MI, WV and other states, and in Ontario, Canada.
- Owner
- BetMGM, LLC operatorMGM Resorts International jv partner, 50% NYSE: MGM
- Established
- 2018 (domain registered 24 years ago)
- Minimum deposit
- $10
How long the money actually takes
These are end-to-end times: from the moment you request a withdrawal to the moment it is spendable, including the operator's own review window. They are not the "instant" figure a cashier screen shows.
| Method | Time to your hands |
|---|---|
| PayPal fastest | 2 days |
| Visa | 5 days |
The welcome offer
We show this because you will be offered it. It is not part of any score on this site: a large bonus tells you what a casino spends on acquiring you, not how it treats you afterwards. What these terms actually cost, measured across every offer we hold.
100% deposit match up to $1,000 plus $25 on the house for new casino customers (offer varies by state: $25 in NJ/MI, $50 in WV, 100 bonus spins in PA)
- Market
- us. Terms differ by market; this offer is not available everywhere
- Wagering
- 15 on bonus
- Game weighting
- Slots 100% · Jackpot Slots 100% how much each game type counts toward the wagering requirement
What regulators have done about BetMGM
| Date | Regulator | Against | Amount | What happened |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (exact) | Massachusetts Gaming Commission | BetMGM, LLC | USD 7,500 | The IEB recommended a civil administrative penalty of $7,500 for noncompliance with 205 CMR 247.01(1), 205 CMR 247.01(2)(i) and the Massachusetts Gaming Commission Sports Wagering Catalog occurring between 22 June 2025 and 15 August 2025. BetMGM waived its right to an adjudicatory hearing and the Commission voted to adopt the penalty on 18 June 2026. source |
| (exact) | Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board | BetMGM, LLC | USD 100,000 | The Board approved a consent agreement imposing a $100,000 fine after finding BetMGM failed to have sufficient procedures to prevent fraudulent behaviour on its BetMGM and Borgata wagering platforms, including insufficient Know-Your-Customer protocols that allowed creation and use of multiple accounts using other individuals' personal identifying information and funding via stolen or fraudulently obtained payment devices. The agreement identified four fraud rings. source |
| (exact) | Massachusetts Gaming Commission | BetMGM, LLC | USD 15,000 | The IEB recommended a civil administrative penalty of $15,000 for two incidents of noncompliance with 205 CMR 247.01(2)(i) and the Massachusetts Sports Wagering Catalog occurring on 17-18 November 2024 and from 5 July 2024 to 7 March 2025. BetMGM waived its right to an adjudicatory hearing and the Commission voted unanimously to adopt the penalty on 12 March 2026. source |
| (exact) | Massachusetts Gaming Commission | BetMGM, LLC | USD 6,500 | The IEB recommended a civil administrative penalty of $6,500 for noncompliance with G.L. c. 23N, s. 3 and 205 CMR 247.01(2)(a)(1) occurring on 19 October 2024. BetMGM waived its right to an adjudicatory hearing and the Commission voted unanimously to adopt the penalty on 12 March 2026. source |
| (exact) | West Virginia Lottery Commission | BetMGM, LLC | — | At its 28 January 2026 meeting the Commission approved the Director's recommendation to impose a civil penalty upon Management Service Provider BetMGM, LLC for violation of W. Va. Code R. 179-9-15. The published action items do not state the penalty amount. source |
| (exact) | Massachusetts Gaming Commission | BetMGM, LLC | USD 60,000 | Following an adjudicatory proceeding conducted 18 June 2025, the Commission found BetMGM violated G.L. c. 23N, s. 3 and 205 CMR 247.01(2)(a), (2)(e), (1) and (2)(i) across six noncompliance matters between 10 March 2023 and 11 June 2024, comprising 20,398 impermissible wagers with a total handle of $360,901.09. The matters involved NCAA college football player proposition wagers, soccer penalty card wagers, wagers on Belarusian leagues and teams, NCAA NIT and women's basketball player proposition wagers, and Glory Kickboxing wagers. The Commission fined BetMGM $60,000. source |
| (exact) | Colorado Limited Gaming Control Commission | BetMGM, LLC d/b/a Roar Digital | — | The Commission approved a Stipulation and Agreement in Case No. DOG25004556 concerning BetMGM, LLC d/b/a Roar Digital. The minutes record discussion regarding the definition of a proposition bet and the role of a live trader. The Commission's minutes do not state a penalty amount. source |
| (exact) | Massachusetts Gaming Commission | BetMGM, LLC | USD 10,000 | The IEB recommended a civil administrative penalty of $10,000 for noncompliance with 205 CMR 247.01(1), 205 CMR 247.01(2)(i) and the Massachusetts Sports Wagering Catalog occurring between 20 March 2023 and 14 May 2024. BetMGM waived its right to an adjudicatory hearing and the Commission voted unanimously to adopt the penalty on 22 May 2025. source |
| (exact) | Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board | BetMGM, LLC | USD 260,905 | The Board approved a consent agreement assessing $260,905 against Interactive Gaming Operator BetMGM, LLC for 152 instances in which an individual on the Board's Interactive Self-Exclusion List was permitted to gamble on its sites. source |
| (exact) | Indiana Gaming Commission | BetMGM, LLC d/b/a Roar Digital | USD 7,500 | Settlement resolving two counts: failing to renew seven occupational licenses in a timely manner, and violating the rules for prohibited participants when a prohibited participant was allowed to place wagers on the platform. Roar Digital agreed to a monetary settlement of $7,500. source |
| (exact) | Indiana Gaming Commission | BetMGM, LLC d/b/a Roar Digital | USD 7,500 | Settlement resolving three counts: violating the rules and internal control procedures on responsible gaming limits, and two counts of failing to file a level one license application in a timely manner. Roar Digital agreed to a monetary settlement of $7,500. source |
| (observed) | New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement (DGE) | Roar Digital (BetMGM, then known as Roar Digital) predecessor | USD 8,880 | A letter in lieu of Complaint sent 15 May 2020 alleged Roar allowed a self-excluded patron to create an account and play, in violation of N.J.A.C. 13:69G-2.4(a)2. The Division WAIVED civil penalties and ordered disgorgement of $8,880.00 in monies won from the self-excluded patron — this is a disgorgement, not a fine. source |
| (observed) | New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement (DGE) | BetMGM | USD 2,000 | The Director imposed a $2,000 civil penalty on BetMGM pursuant to a Notice of Violation for depositing expired tournament tickets to patron accounts. Cited to the Division's own Summary of Actions. source |
| (exact) | Maryland Lottery and Gaming Control Commission | BetMGM, LLC | USD 1,000 | A Notice of Alleged Violations dated 11 September 2023 cited violations of the Sports Wagering Law for the 1-31 December 2022 monthly audit period. The consent agreement, ratified at the 26 October 2023 Commission meeting, requires payment of $1,000 with no admission or denial of a violation. source |
| (exact) | Indiana Gaming Commission | BetMGM, LLC d/b/a Roar Digital | USD 1,500 | Settlement resolving one count of failing to comply with Commission deadlines and failing to submit fingerprints for licensees in a timely manner. Roar Digital agreed to a monetary settlement of $1,500. source |
| (exact) | Ohio Casino Control Commission | BETMGM, LLC | USD 150,000 | Final order imposing administrative sanctions in Case No. 2023-SGR-001, following a Notice of Violation dated 5 January 2023, for sports gaming advertising and promotion violations under Ohio Adm.Code 3775-16-08 and 3775-16-09, including advertisements run without a clear or conspicuous problem-gambling message and approved helpline, and promotions or bonuses described as 'free' when a patron was required to incur a loss or risk their own money. The Commission ordered a monetary fine of $150,000 and required training of BetMGM and affiliate marketer personnel. source |
| (exact) | Indiana Gaming Commission | BetMGM, LLC d/b/a Roar Digital | USD 13,500 | Settlement resolving one count of failing to notify the Commission of numerous terminations in a timely manner. Roar Digital agreed to a monetary settlement of $13,500 in lieu of disciplinary action. source |
| (exact) | Indiana Gaming Commission | BetMGM, LLC d/b/a Roar Digital | USD 28,250 | Settlement resolving one count of failing to properly restrict sports wagering prohibited participants due to data discrepancies; two prohibited participants received multiple marketing pieces while not properly restricted. Roar Digital agreed to a monetary settlement of $28,250 in lieu of disciplinary action. source |
| (exact) | Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board | BetMGM, LLC (jointly with Mountainview Thoroughbred Racing Association, LLC) | USD 7,500 | The Board approved a consent agreement jointly fining Mountainview Thoroughbred Racing Association, LLC and BetMGM, LLC $7,500 for accepting and paying out 76 wagers on the 11 September 2021 Victor Belfort vs. Evander Holyfield boxing match after the PGCB notified all operators that wagering on the event would not be permitted. source |
| (exact) | Maryland Lottery and Gaming Control Commission | BetMGM, LLC, d/b/a Roar Digital | USD 146,000 | By a Notice of Alleged Violations dated 8 December 2022, the Agency alleged BetMGM accepted live sports wagers on 16 November 2022 through its mobile platform without being authorised or licensed to do so. The consent agreement requires payment of $146,000 and contains no admission or denial of a violation. source |
| (exact) | Indiana Gaming Commission | BetMGM, LLC d/b/a Roar Digital | USD 11,750 | Settlement agreement resolving two counts, approved by the Commission at its 30 June 2022 meeting. Roar Digital agreed to a monetary settlement totalling $11,750. The order PDF is a scanned image; the amount comes from the Commission's meeting transcript. source |
| (exact) | New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement (DGE) | BetMGM, LLC | USD 25,000 | The Division filed a complaint on 1 October 2021 alleging that on 10 and 20 March 2021 BetMGM, LLC accepted wagers on two prohibited events. A $25,000 civil penalty was imposed under a Stipulation of Settlement. source |
| (exact) | Indiana Gaming Commission | BetMGM, LLC d/b/a Roar Digital | USD 63,938 | Settlement agreement resolving three counts, approved by the Commission at its 8 March 2022 meeting. Roar Digital agreed to a monetary settlement totalling $63,938. The order PDF is a scanned image with no text layer; the amount comes from the Commission's own meeting transcript, which does not break the counts down individually. source |
| (exact) | Indiana Gaming Commission | BetMGM, LLC d/b/a Roar Digital | USD 42,000 | Settlement resolving four counts: failing to timely apply for licensure, violating the rules on past posting, violating the rules and internal controls for voluntarily excluded persons, and violating the rules on occupational licensee suitability. Roar Digital agreed to a monetary settlement of $42,000 in lieu of disciplinary action. source |
| (exact) | New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement (DGE) | BetMGM | USD 500 | A Notice of Violation served 2 August 2021 imposed a $500 civil penalty for failure to ensure the Evolution Live Dealer tip functionality worked as intended, in violation of N.J.A.C. 13:69D-2.2(a). BetMGM agreed to the penalty on 20 August 2021. source |
| (exact) | Indiana Gaming Commission | BetMGM, LLC d/b/a Roar Digital | USD 5,500 | Settlement resolving two counts: failing to timely submit an application for licensure, and accepting wagers on event categories before approval. Roar Digital agreed to a monetary settlement of $5,500 in lieu of disciplinary action. source |
| (exact) | Indiana Gaming Commission | BetMGM, LLC d/b/a Roar Digital | USD 13,000 | Settlement resolving two counts: accepting wagers on event categories before approval, and violating the rules on e-sports wagering. Roar Digital agreed to a monetary settlement of $13,000 in lieu of disciplinary action. source |
Actions against a sister brand or a wider group are listed for context but do not affect this brand's score. Only actions against the brand itself or the company it grew out of do.
Where each of these facts came from
Every claim above is tied to the document we read it in. If a fact has no source here, it is not on this page — we drop unsourced data rather than publish it.
| Fact | Source | Read on |
|---|---|---|
| bonus headline | casino.betmgm.com | 2026-07-16 |
| bonus headline | casino.betmgm.com | 2026-07-16 |
| bonus market | casino.betmgm.com | 2026-07-16 |
| countries allowed | www.betmgminc.com | 2026-07-16 |
| domain age years | rdap.verisign.com | 2026-07-17 |
| established year | www.betmgminc.com | 2026-07-16 |
| game providers | casino.betmgm.com | 2026-07-16 |
| game weighting | casino.betmgm.com | 2026-07-16 |
| license authority | gamingcontrolboard.pa.gov | 2026-07-16 |
| license authority | www.njoag.gov | 2026-07-16 |
| license status | gamingcontrolboard.pa.gov | 2026-07-16 |
| license status | www.njoag.gov | 2026-07-16 |
| min deposit | casino.betmgm.com | 2026-07-16 |
| owner company | www.betmgminc.com | 2026-07-16 |
| payment methods | casino.betmgm.com | 2026-07-16 |
| payout hours by method | casino.betmgm.com | 2026-07-16 |
| wagering | casino.betmgm.com | 2026-07-16 |
| wagering scope | casino.betmgm.com | 2026-07-16 |
Questions people ask about BetMGM
Is BetMGM licensed, and by which regulator?
BetMGM is licensed by Multiple US state regulators; primary. The licence was active when we checked the regulator’s own public register on 18 July 2026. You can check it yourself in the register entry we used.
Who owns BetMGM?
BetMGM is owned through BetMGM, LLC (operator); MGM Resorts International (jv partner, 50%), listed on NYSE: MGM; Entain plc (jv partner, 50%), listed on LSE: ENT. Ownership of these companies changes by takeover faster than most registers update, so we date it: this is the structure we recorded on 18 July 2026. Source: the filing we read.
Which other casinos share an owner with BetMGM?
BetMGM shares a corporate owner with 4 other casinos we have mapped: Coral, Ladbrokes, Sportingbet, bwin. This matters more than a trivia answer: a regulator’s finding against one brand in a group tells you something about the company running all of them, and a self-exclusion you set at one brand does not automatically stop at that brand.
Has BetMGM been fined by a gambling regulator?
Yes. We have recorded 27 published enforcement actions against BetMGM or the company it operates under. The most recent was by Massachusetts Gaming Commission on 18 June 2026, a USD 7,500 penalty. Read the regulator’s published decision. Every action we hold is listed with its date, amount and source further up this page.
How long does a withdrawal from BetMGM actually take?
The fastest route we recorded is PayPal at 2 days. The slowest is Visa at 5 days. These are end-to-end times: from requesting the money to it being spendable, including the operator’s own review window. They are not the “instant” figure a cashier screen shows, which times only the last step. Source: the operator’s published terms.
Browse casinos like BetMGM
Jump to a directory of every researched casino that shares a trait with it:
Compare BetMGM
Casinos you could use instead of BetMGM — the nearest by game studios, payments and countries served.
Head to head: